October 24, 2004
Back to the drawing board.
Maybe I just don't get it, but I can't believe that this is the big story that so many bloggers got all worked up about. Apparently, Kerry has claimed several times to have met with all the members of the Security Council, but four out of five deny that any such meeting took place.
Kerry is running as the pro/anti war candidate, the pro/anti Patriot Act candidate, the pro/anti abortion candidate, the pro/anti gay marriage candidate, the pro/anti No Child Left Behind candidate, the war hero/anti-war activist candidate and y'all think that this is going to make a dent? Kerry lied. If people are still voting for him after all of the above, this news is going to be greeted with a big 'who the hell cares, he's not George W. Bush'.
Update: Truth Laid Bear writes that we shouldn't hold Kerry to lower standards just because he has none. He may have a point.
Update: Ace should reconsider exactly what he would've done to get this particular story early.
Update: Bill at INDC thinks it is a big deal that Kerry so blatantly lied. I dunno. Maybe I'm jaded.
Update: Spoons says it best 'I call upon the blogosphere to permanently abstain from any more of these, "I got a tip a big scandal will break in a couple days but I can't tell you what it is" stories.'
Update: Protein Wisdom is jaded too (and weary).
Update: I wonder if Powerline still considers this a big story, now that it's in print.
Posted by Karol at October 24, 2004 11:53 PM | TrackBackTechnorati Tags:
Well, if the Bush campaign would throw together a really good ad, I think it would be damaging. But I am not completely happy with the Bush campaign. They have missed to many opportunities!
Posted by: Dorian at October 25, 2004 12:21 AMWhat we need is for someone to break the story about Kerry's discharge from the Navy in a major media outlet.
I've read about it on the Internet in several places and it looks legit but no one has tried very seriously to get it picked up.
Posted by: Alex at October 25, 2004 12:27 AMI agree about the yawn factor, and for the same reasons you stated. Anyone still voting for Kerry is simply anti-Bush all the way and would vote the Democratic ticket regardless. Sad state of affairs, but the MSM will absolutely not challenge Kerry on this. If they were going to do that they would have demanded his military records, which they have been unapologetically incurious about. If we don't win, the MSM and the Democratic party will feel emboldened to do this again. If Kerry can be elected, ANYONE can.
Posted by: mikem at October 25, 2004 04:50 AMAlex, if Bush-leaning undecideds weren't swayed by the Air National Guard stories in two gubernatorial elections and the 2000 race, what makes you think that a 30-year-old story about Kerry's discharge would sway Kerry-leaning undecideds?
More importantly, if the Air National Guard story just wasn't important, why is the story of Kerry's discharge? Both stories are just examples of partisans trying to dig up dirt on the other guy without concern for whether that dirt is relevant or timely.
It's too bad so many bloggers whom I respect got so caught up in their own intrinsic partisanship that they jumped on the bandwagon. Friends, "Candidate exaggerates during stump speech" is not news. I don't care how good your case is — Kerry's been running on a platform of diplomacy, and here are diplomats who deny that he spoke the truth — or how persuasively you make it. It's just not important eight days before the election.
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at October 25, 2004 08:10 AMMost voter polls have consistently put President Bush and Senator John Kerry in a near tie in presidential race, but some projections that use economic-based models say it's Bush in November.
An Economy.com model gives Bush 373 electoral college votes, well ahead of the 270 electoral votes he needs to win. Kerry lands only 10 states, according to the model -- Illinois and California are the only two outside a handful of East Coast states.
The model seeks to guess voter behavior by looking at per capita income growth and inflation trends in the states. It also plugs in some non-economic factors such as a political party's share in the last presidential election.
The model does suggest "President Bush is going to win a big victory," said Gus Faucher, a senior economist from Economy.com, a consultant. Still Faucher isn't convinced that the economic-based forecasting model will be right in November.
"The election is going to be closer than this," he said. "At this point we're going to project a Bush victory, but it's going to be an interesting month." The two remaining debates between Bush and Kerry are likely to play a key role, he said.
This is great news for the President since Kerry has been down playing the US Economy...more to come,
TexasRenfro
Posted by: Texas Renfro at October 25, 2004 11:09 AMI'm, as they say, underwhelmed.
Posted by: ken at October 25, 2004 12:47 PM


