January 10, 2005
Ignorance shouldn't be a crime
I became a Glasgow Celtic fan by accident. During my first few months in Scotland, someone gave me the Celtic shirt, told me that most of the town preferred Rangers (the big rivals of Celtic) and that was that.
When I came back to the U.S, going to watch Celtic games in Southie pubs in Boston made me feel connected to Scotland. Though the fans were mostly Irish, there was something about drinking a pint of beer at 9am while watching soccer in a room full of men with accents that wildly appealed to me. I also loved the songs. We'd sing 'when the ball hits the net and its not George Cadette it's DiCanio' (to the tune of 'That's Amore'). The two men mentioned in the song were my favorite players.
So, of course, I'm sad that Paolo DiCanio may have given (judge for yourself in this photo) a fascist salute after his team's win recently. He could just be waving but there is other evidence to show he knew exactly what he was doing. And, for that, Italians should shun him, criticize him, and turn their backs to him when he plays. If he broke the rules of his sport, then he should be punished accordingly. But, the BBC is confirming that 'police are sifting through photographs and film footage of the incident to see if Di Canio's actions merit any criminal charge' and this is where the story takes a turn I can not abide.
I understand the history of fascism and I've written before about family members that had died in World War II fighting against it. But the idea that a certain positioning of the arm can be considered a crime is absurd. I also fully understand Italy's specific history with fascism and still believe that the freedom to be whatever you want to be as long as you don't hurt anyone else, however atrocious, should never warrant criminal charges.
Reading the rought draft of this post to Dawn Summers, she tried to draw the parallel between FCC regulations on our tv viewing with possible charges filed for DiCanio's salute. I don't see the connection. The FCC does not file criminal charges for Janet Jackson's exposed breasts. The government allows use of the public airwaves in return for the following of certain rules. Whether the rules are unfair, as I often think they are, is irrelevant since there is an alternative method called cable television which allows the broadcast of pretty much anything, Janet Jackson's breast included. When these rules are broken, a fine may be levied. I don't remember hearing about police poring over Jackson's breast (officially anyway). And therein lies the difference.
A society that makes speech or thought illegal is doomed to have the force it tries to supress rise up. Italy should reconsider its turning an incident of stupidity into a crime.
Posted by Karol at January 10, 2005 09:25 PM | TrackBackTechnorati Tags:
Both Italy and German have laws against showing support for Nazi's or Fascists or displaying their symbols.
Symbols and gestures were an important part of the mystique of those parties so I have no trouble supporting their ban.
A commenter over at Tim Blair said it best: Amazing how it's a criminal offence to make a fascist salute but you can wear an OBL or Che shirt any day of the week.
And that's exactly it. Where's the line? I think OBL or Che promote(d) murder and hate. Should it be illegal for idiots to sport them on their shirts?
Posted by: Karol at January 10, 2005 10:22 PMThe pic I keep seeing is too small. A bigger shot or even an angle with the crowd in it would help me out.
Other than that, I agree that while the FCC goes too far, this isn't the same thing. Same with the position of the arm.
Posted by: Shawn at January 10, 2005 10:22 PMAlthough, it is illegal to expose yourself in public. And can't we all thank God for that?
Posted by: candy girl at January 10, 2005 10:30 PMIf you ever miss watching Celtic games with a bunch of Catholics, you can always head down to Rocky Sullivan's on 28th and Lex.
Posted by: Sean at January 10, 2005 10:31 PMI've been to Rocky's and I've seen some games at the Parlour on W.86th and at Boomers when that place was still around.
Posted by: Karol at January 10, 2005 10:34 PMRocky's is an IRA pub.
Don't support terrorists.
Is it illegal to expose yourself in public? Laws in most countries are confusing. It is not specifically an offence to be naked. Hence you can (in theory, and in Germany in pratice) walk down the street naked, or go to a nudist beach etc. However, 'flashing' is a crime. Weird huh? However, JJ showing her breast was not done to intimidate anyone, so isnt a crime. She just broke broadcasting rules.
Facism isnt specifically racial hatred. But in the EU we have laws against promoting hatred. Freedom of expression/speech is a crock of ****. The US got that one wrong.
Wasn't Simon simply scratching his temple with his middle finger?
Isn't niggard a Middle English word for stingy?
Was that a Black Power salute from John Kerry?
I agree with you entirely on this one, but I think the entry is mistitled. Ignorance? What makes you think DiCanio was acting out of ignorance. Some peoplare just naturally hateful/racist/have fascist inclindations, and they've thought about their positions a good deal. Calling him merely ignorant sounds generous.
Still, well argued nonetheless.
Posted by: J. Nathan at January 11, 2005 07:40 AMThe big deal in this case is that Di Canio was playing for Italian strugglers Lazio. Lazio, I believe, are known for having a sizable fascist element in thier support. Given Di Canio was facing them, it looks less like ignorance.
Sean and Karol, looks like your tacit financial support for terrorist bombings on the British mainland was out of ignorance.
And Sean, why miss watching 'tic games with only Catholics ? I know Protestants, and it would seem, one Jew who support Celtic. What the fuck has religion got to do with football? It is bad enough in this country trying to help wipe out the bigotry without those in other countries subscribing to it in the mistaken belief that it is a quaint tradition.
You're right, J., he probably wasn't ignorant in the sense that he didn't know what he was doing. I consider those people with natural fascist tendencies to also be naturally ignorant. You can't have heard about how fascism nearly destroyed your country and the world and still be into it without being ignorant, I think.
Posted by: Karol at January 11, 2005 09:10 AMUrbane, like I note in the post above to J., I believe that it is ignorant to be fascist, especially in a country like Italy that clearly has seen the results of that movement.
As for the 'Catholic' note, how else do you explain a bunch of Irish guys watching a Scottish team. You may not want football to have anything to do with religion, but it seems it does anyway. Why the defensiveness? Last I checked, you were no Celtic fan.
Posted by: Karol at January 11, 2005 09:33 AMI would think Di Canio knows exactly what he is doing but maybe he got carried away. Lazio is a right wing club and before becoming a professional footballer Di Canio was a hardcore ultra member and has always been a hero to the supporters. Football in Italy is very political with most clubs either being left or right wing.
I would think that most democratic country's have some sort of law that is against some sort of freedom of speech or act.
Posted by: supersexy29 at January 11, 2005 12:22 PMUrbane: The defining difference between Celtic's and Rangers' fans has always been religion. Don't go all PC on us.
Karol: Was being a Celtic fan in Glasgow like being a conservative in NYC?
Posted by: ugarte at January 11, 2005 01:01 PMI never lived in Glasgow. In fact, I've only visited once in the several years I was in Scotland. I lived in Forres, a small town in the north for awhile and then in Aberdeen. I also spent a month in Edinburgh and visited it often.
Posted by: Karol at January 11, 2005 01:06 PMso which is the catholic team?
Posted by: Dawn Summers at January 11, 2005 01:07 PMCeltic.
Posted by: Karol at January 11, 2005 01:49 PMCeltic are supposedly the Catholic team, though have had protestant (as well as Jewish and Muslim) players,supporters, and managers. Indeed, part of their ground is named after a Protestant manager. They were started by Irish immigrants as a charity in the 19th century, so the Irish connection is more valid. Rangers are probably the more guilty of the two for bigotry - with anti Catholic songs still very audible at games. Rangers became a focal point for Ulster Protestants. Religious connections are fine, but this frequently overflows into hatred - deaths after games aren't uncommon, and violence almost mandatory. The clubs serve as a focal point for religious divides in the west of Scotland.
Why defensive? Because both clubs are making efforts to remove the outdated religious hatred from the rivalry. I would like them both to play in the English League - as they desire, and let everyone else get on with it - a plague on both their houses.
By the way Karol, there is a decent sized Celtic supporters club in Forres, and probably several in Aberdeen - you were a bit misinformed there.
Fair point about Di Canio and automatically equating fascism with ignorance. Somehow though, I could imagine him singing Internatioanale with gusto had he been playing elsewhere, and the circumstances been favourable. I think the fact that he is a tit who loves adoration outweighs his political motives.
Posted by: Urbane McMeercat at January 11, 2005 03:04 PMI'm nae a Billy, I'm a Tim
I'm nae a Billy, I'm a Tim
I'm nae a Billy, don't be f****n silly
I'm nae a Billy, I'm a Tim
The Old Firm fans rank alongside Burns, Wilde and Shakespeare with their gifts to the English language. FTP, FTQ, F them all.
Posted by: Urbane McMeercat at January 11, 2005 07:44 PMIn Italy what Di Canio did (promotion of fascism) is illegal. Fact. Stop pushing stupid American notions of 'freedom of expression' on us Euros. There is always a consequence to an action, I hope he gets banned from playing.
Anyway Celtic were always a catholic side, like Manchester Utd; but Rangers weren't Protestant, except by accident (in that every Catholic Glawegian was a Celtic fan). Rangers were first to sign a Catholic player in the late 1980s; I am not sure when Celtic started signing non-Catholic players.
@ Urbane: religion has a lot to do with football. Some clubs like Ajax, Tottenham Hotspur are 'Jewish'. Of course after 1945 Ajax didnt have many Jews left in Amsterdam to support the club - so times move on. And these days Arsenal FC have as many Jewish fans as Tottenham. But tradition remains and you will see Stars of Davids at Ajax games; Spurs fans are called 'Yids'...
Today there's a lot of 'ethnic' clubs springing up in Britain to attract black and asian (esp muslim) players.
Monio, Celtic have been signing Protestants and non Catholics for years. Jock Stein, their most successful manager who led them to the European cup was a Protestant. He played for them in the 50s, so they were signing non Catholics even then. Celtic, in the 70s, signed ex Rangers player (and by definition, Protestant)Alfie Conn, pre dating Rangers big Mo Johnston deal which you refer to by 15 years.
Rangers Protestant by accident. Like they accidently used to let the Orange Lodge have an annual convention at Ibrox then.


