February 23, 2005
Someone Else's Story (by guest blogger Dorian Davis)
Voter Registration in Manhattan:
Democrats: 581,000
Republicans: 99,000
Last night, I went to the first meeting of the School of Applied Politics (S.O.A.P.)--a biweekly program for people interested in pursuing city council seats--at the Metropolitan Republican Club in Manhattan. There were some great candidates, and I hope they run, but will they?
The media scrutiny is so intense and, often, ugly, that people who could viably overcome the background checks, by the press and the opposition, and make a successful candidacy--people without skeletons in their closets--are dull, and suffer from personality deficits. Those unexciting people run for citywide and national offices and, more often than not, they lose. Why? A couple of reasons. The most obvious is the six-to-one ratio of Democrats to Republicans in Manhattan. But, it is more than that. After all, Rudy Giuliani and Mike Bloomberg won mayoral races on a Republican ticket, and Pataki won the State House. The perpetual losing streak of Republican candidates in many of the State Assembly and Congressional districts is because of the shortage of centrist, broadly-appealing and likable candidates to go up against the Democratic incumbents, with the deck already stacked against us demographically.
The local Republican Party designates our candidates, but the party has been actively pursuing strong candidates, and the vetting process is not the problem. The problem is that interesting people--even now, in the post-Clintonian Age--are afraid to run for public office, because they are afraid that their personal lives will be raped and pillaged, and that their privacy will be violated. And, sadly, it probably will be. That's why a lot of good potential candidates resign themselves to the idea of that old song "Someone Else's Story" from Chess, "I could take my chances further down the line."
What do we do about it? Well, someday--and it won't be long--a candidate with a lot of potential and a colorful past has to bite the bullet and run for a citywide office, on the Republican ticket, in New York City. He will hold a press conference, and neutralize all of his vulnerabilities by admitting them, the day that he announces his candidacy. Of course, fallibility is appalling, so he will fall dramatically behind in the polls, but voters will remember that he was honest about his humble past, and appreciate it, whether or not they return to his fold. Eventually, his campaign will hit its stride, a few months later, and his past will be old news. He will spend the rest of the campaign talking about the issues. The future. He will combine experience, good ideas, policy plans, and--most important to his ability to sell his policy plans and build a coalition--his charisma. Hopefully, it will remind us that politics is a game of chess--not an application for sainthood. Everybody has something to contribute, and everybody can, and should, play.
Technorati Tags:
Or Republicans can increase their appeal to minority voters in NYC, and from their ranks will come good candidates.
Your scenario, your hope against hope, is far more likely, though.
Posted by: Sean at February 23, 2005 06:34 PMhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahah. Dorian is ssoooooooo adorable.
Posted by: Dawn Summers at February 23, 2005 06:36 PMI'm just wondering: is this mythical candidate you? And, if so, can Alarming News have the exclusive when you announce? :-)
Posted by: Karol at February 24, 2005 12:27 AMHa.
I think the charisma requirement puts me out of the running.
Posted by: Dorian at February 24, 2005 12:56 AMOr we could write off NYC, and concentrate on more conservative areas... Seattle, Providence, and Havana come to mind.
Posted by: Jay at February 24, 2005 01:03 AMEven though we're so badly outnumbered, it's kind of cool to think there are 100,000 Republicans living in Manhattan. There are more than it seems.
Posted by: Karol at February 24, 2005 09:37 AMRepublicans have won, and fairly recently, races on Manhattan's East Side, although the candidates are fairly liberal by GOP standards . In the last 15 years, we've had a congressman, Bill Green, a state senator, Roy Goodman, an assemblyman, John Ravitz and two city councilmen, Andrew Eristoff and Charles Millard. There are no current Republicans in office now, but there are two open city council seats on the upper east side, the 4th district being vacated by Eva Moskowitz and the 5th District being vacated by Gifford Miller. I think the GOP can run competitively in both of these districts this year and conceivably win one or both.
Posted by: bobm at February 24, 2005 12:09 PMI think Dorian is onto something. We certainly have a charisma deficit and a leadership deficit. Our candidates are sitting on the hot issues but are too often afraid to talk about them. If I hear one more candidate say "Oh my god (can I say god here?), if I talk about vouchers the teachers union will run against me!" I'm going to puke.
And I think Dorian, in spite of his claim of lack of charisma, would make a very interesting candidate.
When Herb London was running for State Comptroller in 1994, on th eticket with Pataki, he called pataki a "stuffed suit." We need to stop running stuffed suits for local office and get some exciting, energetic candidates who are not cut from the traditional republican cloth to help the perception of our party match the reality of it being a big tent party.
Posted by: Robert at February 24, 2005 12:36 PMJust remember, Dorian---in the "post-Clinton" age, it is the Republicans who have perfected the art and science of personal destruction. From Ken Starr to the Swiftvet Liars, it is the GOP that has most profitted from the raping and pillaging of candidate's private lives.
You reap what you sow, buddy.
Posted by: Don Myers at February 25, 2005 07:26 AM


