ALARMINGNEWS_1_1.jpg

April 05, 2005

Rules for boys.

I haven't felt particularly political lately. Have you noticed? I've been listening to a ton of music, writing a travel book and generally not sweating politics. I'm also working on a relationship-y piece that I may expand into something if I can. On that note, go check out Jessica's post on when it's ok for male friends to check out other girls' assets. It's rarer than you think.

Posted by Karol at April 5, 2005 03:28 PM | TrackBack
Technorati Tags:
Comments

I totally agree with her. When one sees a man and a woman sitting together talking, it is assumed that they are a couple. If the third party observer catches the guy checking out other women, it's a big insult to the woman he's with, the presumed girlfriend.

Ladies, however, this goes for you too. You're not allowed to check out, dance with, accept a drink from a non-me guy if he didn't clear it with me first. It's a simple courtesy for saving face.

Posted by: Jay at April 5, 2005 03:44 PM

Well this gets into the question of are you somewhere 'with someone' or not. A guy and a girl can go to a bar together even if they're not dating (and even if they're dating other people). But if you go with a person then they deserve a reasonable amount of attention from you. If i went to a bar with a female friend and she spent the whole time ogling guys or talking to other people that would really piss me off.

However, I don't think an occasional look hurts, as long as you're not obvious about it. Sitting and talking with a girl I would never point out someone across the room that I was looking at, but a glance here and there is fine, and if my friend were to notice so what? It can be an amusing conversation starter.

I think the rule should be best expressed as you shouldn't talk about girls as objects while there are women present. Looking is a different matter.

Posted by: Alex at April 5, 2005 08:05 PM

Politics is in a boring stage right now. (The year following the reelection of a president is always the slowest.) That will change over the next few months, either with the fallout from the Nuclear Option or with Supreme Court retirement(s).

Posted by: Mike at April 5, 2005 09:05 PM

There we were having a perfectly happy conversation about dating etiquette, and you go and inject politics into it. Sheesh.

Also, can we please stop calling it "The Nuclear Option?" I prefer to think of it as the "Putting in Line Rogue Senators" option.

But back to dating... here's a quandary. If you aren't EXPLICITY exclusive with someone (though that person may assume so) how many other people is it OK to mess around with?

Posted by: Jay at April 6, 2005 12:31 AM

Also, can we please stop calling it "The Nuclear Option?"

Fine. Nucular Option it is. :)

Posted by: Shawn at April 6, 2005 09:52 AM

I'm in a similar position Karol. Although instead of writing on relationships, I'm writing about dead men I don't care about.

Rachel

Posted by: Rachel Dedic at April 6, 2005 09:01 PM

Republican National Committee unveil new slogans

Posted by: Sam at April 8, 2005 09:34 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?