May 11, 2005
What did Natalie Portman do?
Via Ari Goes Down.
Posted by Karol at May 11, 2005 01:30 PM | TrackBackTechnorati Tags:
NOOOOOO!!!!!!! No! No! No!
Posted by: Tony at May 11, 2005 01:40 PMOh yes - It's for a movie role.
Posted by: Ari at May 11, 2005 01:57 PMClearly, she's auditioning to play King Tut.
Posted by: someone at May 11, 2005 02:01 PMIs it bad that I'm a little turned on right now?
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at May 11, 2005 02:02 PMIt's an improvement... still awful
Posted by: Toby at May 11, 2005 02:17 PMYuck!
Posted by: d-rod at May 11, 2005 02:33 PMEverything will be all right as long as she doesn't tear up a picture of the Pope.
Posted by: Shawn at May 11, 2005 02:43 PMOnly those with a truly sexy cranium can pull that look off.
I approve.
Posted by: Oschisms at May 11, 2005 03:18 PMAll kidding aside — and y'all know what a hard thing that is for me to do — that's a really amazing picture. I hope someday I can take a picture that's half that cool.
Posted by: Jeff Harrell at May 11, 2005 04:12 PMShe's only like 24... it'll grow back.
Posted by: Steve at May 11, 2005 04:46 PMyeah by the time she's 27!
still she doesnt look bad shaved
i would be willing to get really close to her to try out her new hair cut
Posted by: cube at May 12, 2005 09:45 AM"Sinead O' Rebellion.. shock me shock me shock me, with that deviant behavior."
Sorry... I saw that and thought of Empire Records.
Maybe there's something wrong with me, but it looks sexy... in a warped way. It's no worse than that awful pink flamingo crap she sported at the beginning of Closer.
Posted by: Drew at May 12, 2005 10:37 AMShe is cute, but my neighbor Steve does the androgyny thing better. Looks about the same, but green-eyed.
Posted by: Loop at May 13, 2005 06:17 AMCan one DO extensions without ANY hair? Hmmm, the questions of actresses...
Posted by: Jennifer at May 14, 2005 08:42 PM
