ALARMINGNEWS_1_1.jpg

May 23, 2005

All depends on your perspective

I found this kooky blogger who claims that Reuters left out a crucial part of a quote by Saddam's friend George Galloway. He writes:

Latest example, MSNBC had quoted Galloway's comment, "“I want to turn the tables on this neocon, pro-Israel, pro-war, Republican lynch mob.” on their page about Galloway's testimony but has now removed that sentence. Check the link to see what MSNBC did (I will put a copy of this page at my web site because it won't stay forever at Google News.)

Also, Reuters felt it necessary to use an ellipsis to replace the word "pro-Israel" in the lead, quoting Galloway this way: "neo-con … pro-war, Republican lynch mob"

Now, aforemention kooky blogger thinks this proves the 'media's service to Zionism'. I, of course, think it proves that they like Galloway and want Americans to take him seriously, something we wouldn't do if we knew he was throwing around 'pro-Israel' nonsense.

Posted by Karol at May 23, 2005 02:18 AM | TrackBack
Technorati Tags:
Comments

...or it means that they don't want to associate "pro-Israel" with neo-cons and Republicans, because that might begin to make the Republican party look good to a big chunk of the Democratic base.

Posted by: W.C. Varones at May 23, 2005 05:39 AM

Why is that nonsense ? I think it is fair to say that neocons are pro-Israel.

Posted by: Von Bek at May 23, 2005 09:35 AM

Von Bek, at this point in history it's fairly well-known that people who throw the dumb neo-con label around are indicating that the said neo-con is a Jew. We get it. Everyone gets it. For Galloway to add the 'pro-Israel' in there is like drawing us a picture. And, hate to break it to you, but the Iraq war has near zero to do with Israel. Anyone claiming it does probably wants to draw nefarious connections. Also, Americans have already learned the European code for 'I hate Jews'. It's 'I'm anti-Zionism'. MSM couldn't let their new hero go down in flames so early.

Posted by: Karol at May 23, 2005 09:41 AM

I don't quite buy that since I lump a number of Gentiles into neocons, like a lot of the gang at First Things for example (Father Neuhauss strikes me as a liberal mugged by reality).

"And, hate to break it to you, but the Iraq war has near zero to do with Israel."

Did I say Iraq had anything to do with Israel ? While it was in Israel's strategic interests to see Hussein go down, it was also in the interests of a lot other countries including our own.

I think "pro-Israel" not only describes the neocons but most Americans.

And I'm not sure about equating anti-Zionism with anti-Semetism. I think Zionism applies that the Jews are the chosen people of God. I think a lot of people, namely us goyim, would have problems with that. I think we can be pro Isreal without having to buy into the theology.

Posted by: Von Bek at May 23, 2005 09:49 AM

When you wrote "this kooky blogger," I just assumed the link would be to Dawn Summers.

Posted by: Steve at May 23, 2005 09:58 AM

Zionism does not imply any such thing. It implies that the Jews should live in Israel and that is all. Since the Jews already live in Israel, Zionism has started to mean the belief that Jews should remain there. Anti-Zionism is usually anti-Semitic: Everyone else can have their own land, but not those Jews. I've argued before that to be anti-Zionism is to actually be for the destruction of the Jewish people, since Israel is there for the defense of the Jews.

Did I say Iraq had anything to do with Israel ? While it was in Israel's strategic interests to see Hussein go down, it was also in the interests of a lot other countries including our own. No, but that's Galloway's point.

I get what you're saying about the chosen people etc, even though the word Zionism does not relate, but Europeans are generally pretty religion-free. When Galloway talks about the Joooooooos or Zionism, he isn't worried that someone is implying he won't have a place in heaven.

Posted by: Karol at May 23, 2005 09:58 AM

Ah, my apologies then. I certainly accpet your definition of Zionism then as my definiton of pro-Israel.

And I'm sure there is a joke about the Jooooooos being Israeli cows but I can't quite seem to come up with it.

Posted by: Von Bek at May 23, 2005 10:02 AM

"I think "pro-Israel" not only describes the neocons but most Americans."

I think most Americans are much more "anti-terrorist" than "pro-Israel".

Methinks if the Palestinians en-masse took a non-violent and lawful approach to their fight, you could very well have the US split on the resolution.

Posted by: Sean at May 23, 2005 10:32 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?