ALARMINGNEWS_1_1.jpg

May 26, 2005

What's going on in Europe?

--The EU constitution will probably not be approved by referendum in France. Writes Pejmanesque:

One thing I still await is an explanation as to why EU integration is a good thing. What has changed on the continent that further integration is now suddenly seen as a necessity? It cannot be just the need to balance against American power, is it? If it were, EU integration would have been more of a cause during the Cold War since it would have allowed the EU to balance against both American and Soviet power.

--Meanwhile, in Italy, Oriana Fallaci is on trial for insulting Islam. This isn't the first time Fallaci, who smartly lives in New York, has been tried in Europe for daring to speak her mind. 'Miss Fallaci was sued in 2002 over "The Rage and the Pride" in a French court and accused of violating anti-racist laws. The case was dismissed on a technicality.' Paul J. Cella, writing on Red Hot:

Please, Conservatives, I beg of you: Do not simply file this away under the "Europe is dying, and we don't care" file. Doing so amounts to laughing at a neighbor as his house burns down and the fire spreads to threaten your own.

I'm not laughing.

--Liverpool won the European Cup yesterday. There were lots of drunk fans of the team, wearing red, out in NY last night.

--Europe has also gotten Iran to promise to 'continue its freeze on nuclear activities'. This is a situation where I wish Europe luck, but c'mon, are we really just accepting Iran's word here?

--Gerard Schröder is having a hard time in Germany. 'Chancellor Gerhard Schröder's re-election hopes were dealt a fresh blow on Tuesday after a charismatic political rival said he would join leftwing groupings to run against the German leader.' Writes the Kirk:

Schroder's popularity has fallen from a stagnant economy, rising unemployment, and poor economic reforms.

I'm sure Schröder can whip up some anti-Americanism to get his poll numbers up. It worked so well for him the last time around.

--In Scotland, the Conservative party is deciding if it 'should sever ties from its Westminster base'. It's an interesting idea, partly because it really can't get much worse for Conservatives in Scotland. Before this last election, the Conservative party had one seat in all of Scotland, now it has three. Raising money will get more difficult but perhaps selling their message will be easier if they can disassociate themselves from the unpopular party.

Posted by Karol at May 26, 2005 02:13 PM | TrackBack
Technorati Tags:
Comments

Do not simply file this away under the "Europe is dying, and we don't care" file. Doing so amounts to laughing at a neighbor as his house burns down and the fire spreads to threaten your own.

That's an interesting statement. Is there anything that can be done, even if we wanted to do something? I'm of the opinion that 90% of Europe's problems can be traced back to their infatuation with the welfare state, a system that destroys the economy, breaks societal bonds and reduces birth rates all in one blow. I'm including World War II in the list of problems that I think the welfare state ultimately created. Unfortunately the Europeans themselves don't seem to recognize this, which is why it's going to get a lot worse for them before it gets better. If this were the 1930's and people who were being endangered had no option to flee, then it would be a tragedy. But they can and they do, so I don't feel too bad about pointing and laughing.

Posted by: Yaron at May 26, 2005 03:53 PM

Just wrote about the EU Constitution topic myself.

At the very least the EU suffers because it got bigger before better. I am still trying to understand how its exact benefits.

Posted by: mightymerk at May 26, 2005 04:00 PM

Is there anything that can be done, even if we wanted to do something?

For Europe, no. What we can do is be vigilant here at home. Things like the Freedom House report on Wahhabi-sponsored hate material in American mosques, for example, are a good start.

Posted by: Shawn at May 26, 2005 04:34 PM

You include the welfare state for causing WW2 ??? There was barely a welfare state anywhere prior to WW2. Can you elaborate.

Why have a pop at Liverpool fans being drunk ? What is your problem with them celebrating ?

Posted by: Urbane McMeercat at May 26, 2005 06:45 PM

Oh, no, I wasn't criticizing Liverpool fans. I was just summing up news from Europe and noting that I saw fans out last night. Not everything on this list is criticism, you know.

Posted by: Karol at May 26, 2005 07:18 PM

Yaron:

The welfare state is enervating, no question about that; but the root of Europe's decay is spiritual.

I don't feel too bad about pointing and laughing.

That's a disgraceful attitude, in my opinion. Europe has united a huge welfare state with mass unassimilable immigration. The United States is only a few steps behind it on both counts. The fire is spreading; this is no time for laughter.

Posted by: Paul Cella at May 26, 2005 07:29 PM

Ahh, cool. Was a remarkable game.
To answer one of the points above about why Europe is only integrating now - the architects of the Treaty of Rome in the 40s always looked towards integration, but they also knew that it would be a long process. Even Churchill envisioned a United States of Europe, though admittedly one that did not include Britain. It's not a new thing, and it is still very much open to debate whether it is favoured - even in France, where they are likely to reject the constitution in the referendum.

Posted by: Urbane McMeercat at May 26, 2005 07:33 PM

"The fire is spreading; this is no time for laughter"

You don't have West of Scotland Free Presbyterians amongst your ancestors by any chance do you ?

Posted by: Urbane McMeercat at May 26, 2005 07:37 PM

Urbane,

Germany had a welfare state since the 1880's (theirs was the first in the world). F. A. Hayek's "The Road to Serfdom", from 1944, explains how welfare and ever-increasing government intervention in Germany led to growing calls for a "strongman" who could handle all the contradictory demands being put on government, and the growing social unrest, a need eventually filled by the Nazis. The rest is history, as they say. I highly recommend the book, by the way; this summary doesn't really do it justice.

Posted by: Yaron at May 26, 2005 10:36 PM

PC, I guess I'm just more optimistic than you for this country. Our immigrants are in the vast majority hardworking and responsible. Unlike in Europe, there are no neighborhoods in the U.S. where I'd be afraid to walk at night because "there are too many immigrants".

Posted by: Yaron at May 26, 2005 10:42 PM

LIVERPOOL!!!
I was reading the NYC Liverpool supporters club web site the day before the match.

The Mongols had a welfare state in the 13th century.

Posted by: Monjo at May 27, 2005 07:53 AM

"It cannot be just the need to balance against American power, is it?"

Combine all the ancient military equipment that the EU owns, and that gives them the power to balance against the police department of Boston. And the EU has neither the money nor the will to do better.

Posted by: Jake at May 27, 2005 10:19 AM

"Combine all the ancient military equipment that the EU owns"

Ancient ? The factory across the road from where I work sold China the radar system that took down the U.S. Orion a few years back. Not that I am condoning arms sales to China and I did have a double take when I saw the PR of China flag fluttering above the factory a few years back, but there seems to be a move towards Europe shifting from relience on U.S. systems (the new Euro fighter, next generation aircraft carriers etc)

Talking of China, it's not Europe that will pose any threat to U.S. dominance. You guys should look East a little more carefully.

Yaron, I happen to have an early edition of The Road to Serfdom that I picked up in a charity shop. Never felt the need to read it before now, but will have a look. However, do you really think the Welfare State was the driving force behind the war ? Do you view the WW1 reparations settlement and the world economic slump as minor factors. Imperialism also ? After all, I doubt if Japan had a welfare state.
Seems a like dogmatic argument, but I'll see what Freddie has to say.

Posted by: Urbane McMeercat at May 27, 2005 04:55 PM

Well, other factors played a part, and obviously the history of Europe (and Japan) is a history of near-constant wars, but I think welfare and the rise of a discontented and unemployed class was a major factor.

Posted by: Yaron at May 31, 2005 12:16 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?