August 16, 2005
Most pointless conversation I've had today
Walking through security at the airport in Nashville, my bag was pulled due to a lighter in the inside pocket. A man searched around in my bag and then ran it through the machine again only to discover a second lighter, this time loose in my bag.
As he searched the bag again, I said 'I know it's not your fault but doesn't this seem silly to you? I arrived in Nashville on a plane with the same bag with two lighters.'
'Well, ever since that shoe bomber, Reid, we've been taking lighters.'
'Yes,' I said, 'but the problem with Reid wasn't the fact that he got the lighter on the plane but that he got the bomb on. The lesson from the Reid security lapse shouldn't have been to confiscate lighters but instead to look harder for bombs. Taking away my lighters only distracts you from that goal.'
'Ok,' he said, 'you're all set', as he nodded toward my gate.
Posted by Karol at August 16, 2005 02:26 AM | TrackBackTechnorati Tags: Airport+security
Aww, it warms my heart to see our tax dollars working hard.
Posted by: Marco at August 16, 2005 02:55 AMWell....airline security is a farce, but at least its more thorough than, say, railway security, which doesn't exist.
Posted by: Dorian Davis at August 16, 2005 07:42 AMObviously you didn't read ace's story last week about turning a simple lighter into a bomb. And, why are you smoking?
Posted by: ll at August 16, 2005 08:55 AMYou're lucky you didn't get a backhand for sass-back, young lady...
Posted by: Jay at August 16, 2005 08:56 AMSounds like Jay wants to put Karol over his knee. ;)
Karol, you missed Greg Gutfeld flirting with ace yesterday.
Posted by: ll at August 16, 2005 09:40 AMYou know why airport security is both obtrusive and ineffective, don't you?
It's because the Bush regime (like the Clinton regime before it) puts corporate profits above security, every time:
With the cooperation of the FAA, industry leaders have scuttled or watered down just about every significant reform that has been proposed over the past dozen years, including the recommendations of two high-profile presidential commissions.
They've accomplished this, in part, through generous campaign contributions: The airlines gave almost $4.2 million to both political parties during the 2000 elections.
Airport security is outsourced to the lowest bidder, who then hires unqualified people at minimum wage to maximize their profits. As a good little capitalist, you of course must support this wholeheartedly...right?
And of course it doesn't end with airport security:
Cutbacks in federal spending have left New York City, which has been the target of six separate plots by Islamist terrorists in the past decade, with nearly 6,000 fewer police than before 9/11. In fact, New York,"America's front line", will receive nearly $61 million less in federal public-safety subsidies than it did before 9/11. The Bush Administration recently eliminated funding to upgrade police and fire department communications systems. As a result, New York police and firefighters are still using the same outdated radio systems that failed during the 9/11 attacks, and were the direct cause of the deaths of 120 firefighters in the World Trade Center who did not receive the warnings to evacuate the buildings before they collapsed.
Dubya has to pay for those corporate tax cuts and giveaways somehow...right?
Posted by: Don Myers at August 16, 2005 10:45 AMDon, please see the 'It's not that liberals are crazy....' post below. This is a classic example.
Posted by: Karol at August 16, 2005 10:53 AMIn the news on WINS over the weekend were potential lightening of rules on searches and allowing people to bring razor knives, scissors and box cutters on planes. Hmm. My feeling is: "search me boys." If it is going to keep something off the plane (especially a pesky conservative with NOT ONE BUT TWO lighters), go for it!
I don't think searching for anything before boarding that 1) could light something else they might have missed, or 2) could gash something else is in any way problematic.
Posted by: toby at August 16, 2005 10:56 AMDidn't Reid use MATCHES?
Posted by: ken at August 16, 2005 01:02 PMAs smart as Reid was, he probably tried to rub two stick together.
Posted by: ll at August 16, 2005 01:41 PMWow, Don. Great articles you quoted there. Quite timely too. After reading those, I swear I won't vote for President Bush in the 2004 elections.
Posted by: ccs178 (Chris) at August 16, 2005 02:04 PMKarol:
You want to bitch and moan about this problem. I want to know what the problem is and what's causing it.
In your world, that makes me a crazy liberal.
Posted by: Don Myers at August 16, 2005 03:40 PMAnd yet, Don, all we see you doing is bitching and moaning. What have you done to find out what the problem is and what's causing it? Would it be possible, if you can tear yourself away from your intense investigation, for you to lend a hand to O.J. and help him find Nicole's "real" killers as well? No pressure, but we're all counting on you, Don.
Posted by: ccs178 (Chris) at August 17, 2005 09:46 AM


