November 07, 2006
Everybody's doing it
I am notoriously bad at making predictions, but what the hey, here they are anyway:
Maryland: Cardin (D) beats Steele (R)- this is the one I want most to be wrong. I would LOVE to see a Senator Steele, having met and been impressed with him. I just think this is a bad, bad year to be a Republican in a blue state.
Missouri: Talent (R) pulls it out.
Montana: Burns (R) is out. The Abramoff stuff is just too potent but in deference to Montana Jake, I will say fingers crossed.
New Jersey: Menendez (D) wins. It's Joisey, they don't mind corruption in their elected officials.
Ohio: Dewine (R) is gone. Ohio Republicans are having a very tough year and Dewine will be a casualty of that.
Pennsylvania: Awww, Rick Santorum (R). Desperation had him air a last-minute ad about how he sometimes agrees with Hillary Clinton. He's a goner.
Rhode Island: Lincoln Chafee (R), toast. I'm only sad to see him go if it will cost us the majority.
Tennessee: Corker (R) takes it. Ford (D) fumbled real bad when he crashed Corker's event. If it's a matter of trust, as many elections are, Tennessee voters may simply be unable to trust the loose cannon who crashes his opponent's events.
Virginia: Allen (R) in a squeaker. He didn't do anything that bad. Macaca is not a word, I don't care what random monkey-related word was located to prove he's racist. And what's wrong with attacking the fiction writing of your opponent if it includes sex scenes between a little boy and a grown man? I don't get the outrage over either of these supposed missteps and I think Virginia voters will feel the same way.
So, my estimation is that we lose 4 Senate seats. That puts Republicans at 51, Democrats at 47 and Independents at 2.
I have no idea about specific races in the House but I've been feeling that we're going to lose that chamber. Obviously, I hope it doesn't happen but I won't be surprised if it does. Can't win all the time, people, can't win all the time.
Posted by Karol at November 7, 2006 01:16 AM | TrackBackTechnorati Tags: Election+2006 Election+predictions
i think you guys keep montana, but we take virginia. stupid ford.
Posted by: not dawn summers at November 7, 2006 01:30 AMThe most disappointing aspect of Santorum's loss-and to be honest, I don't hold out much hope for him either-is who he'll be losing to.
If he were defeated by some liberal heavyweight like Ed Rendell, or a popular congressman like Tim Holden, then it would be somewhat understandable.
But to lose to such a non-entity-an absolute zero in every conceivable way-with nothing speaking in his favor except for his surname...
It's just depressing, and proves that the Northeast is a dead zone for the GOP.
Posted by: Gerard at November 7, 2006 02:24 AMThis actually jives, seat by seat, with the 51-49 (sorry but those 2 indies caucus with the Dem) I've been saying the last few weeks. And the GOP loses the House and, most importantly, a major swing in the governor races.
Posted by: Von Bek at November 7, 2006 07:42 AMLike Dawn, I think the Dems will win Virginia (not that they care there about Macaca as much as it played on the national stage). I agree Dems will win the house, but I think the Senate will likely be a tie (and Joe Lieberman will die from an exploded ego knowing just how powerful his little dirt bag self has become). I think Dems will overall win the governor races, including Ohio, which is importan for 08' and the 50 state initiative.
Either way, it'll be a huge Democrat day. I can smell the cannon fire and victory on the battlefield (so to speak). Poor ol Bushie will still blindly call it a victory at 10pm until someone slaps him.
Gays, however, like Bush, won't have such a great day. Wisconsin could reject a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, but I doubt it. I think the amendment could go 8 for 8.
Posted by: Toby at November 7, 2006 08:49 AMi also made predictions. some of them agree with yours, but the big difference is that I HAVE PICTURES. i think just to be nice, even though harold ford isn't going to beat corker, you should put up a picture of that democratic sex kitten as a political obituary of sorts.
Posted by: E.E. Grimshaw at November 7, 2006 10:07 AMHow can a political maven be bad at predictions? The problem, Karol, is that, like me, you care too much about the outcome.
Predictions don't matter. What matters is getting out to vote.
Gerard, if you're right about the northeast being a dead zone for the GOP, and I think you are, I hope the RINO-pushing "pragmatists" will get swept out of state and local party leadership next year. It's time for conservative Republicans in the northeast to strategize and take control.
Posted by: Michael Bates at November 7, 2006 10:44 AMI think I make good predictions when I am where the election is taking place. I'm pretty outgoing and feel I can take a place's pulse before the election. But living in NY and trying to predict what people in Montana are going to do is very difficult. The only time I can remember being wrong about an election happening where I was living was in Georgia when I thought Herman Cain would force Isakson into a runoff. He came close.
Posted by: Karol at November 7, 2006 10:46 AMDidn't you also think Coors was going to win?
I think Cain was a bit of wishcasting because of your respect and admiration for the man. I don't remember anyone else thinking he had a chance.
I make no predictions outside of New York - and I don't have any idea what is going to happen in the hot House races in NY. I'm going to try not to watch until the results are final. Based on recent experience, I am setting my alarm for 4am.
Posted by: Charles at November 7, 2006 11:20 AMOnce I got to Colorado and saw the Salazar ads saying that Coors didn't want the death penalty for Osama bin Laden, I knew Coors was not going to win.
And Cain came very close, like within 3 points of holding Isakson to a runoff. Whether or not he would've won the runoff is a different story entirely but many people thought there would be one.
Posted by: Karol at November 7, 2006 11:26 AMThe current InTrade markets (RealClearPolitics links them) agree with you on all but Missouri and Virginia. In other words, they have Dems gaining six seats.
Posted by: Yaron at November 7, 2006 12:23 PMRepublicans will pick up seats in the House and Senate. Early news is the Republican turnout is HUGE.
Posted by: Jake at November 7, 2006 01:04 PMEarly turnout on Jake's morning bar tab is huge.
Posted by: Charles at November 7, 2006 02:23 PMExit polls! Exit polls! My kingdom for some bloody exit polls ! Ack, since I gave up drinking, my nerves are shot. I can't deal with suspense anymore. I was a wreck Saturday night watching the Shannon Briggs fight seeing if my boy from Brooklyn could come back. Now I'm a wreck wondering what's happening in the elections and nobody is posting exit polls. This is why I read history-I know what happens and that reassures me. As anyone seen exit polls?
Posted by: Von Bek at November 7, 2006 02:26 PMSo, have the republicans conceded that they got their collective asses kicked (because you know they will)?
Posted by: jay at November 7, 2006 04:16 PMNo Jay, I think they're being all crazy and actually waiting for election results to come in.
Posted by: Karol at November 7, 2006 04:20 PMHow late is this wake going?
Posted by: jay at November 7, 2006 09:15 PMA couple of my election predictions have already been shot down. Perry and Kinky are doing better than I expected.
How 'bout that Lincoln Chafee?
Posted by: Shawn at November 7, 2006 10:39 PM


