January 05, 2007
Feel safe?
My trip back to America was long and arduous. Or, y'know, just long.
As I mentioned in a previous post, a passenger on our ship had a heart attack, the ship headed for the nearest port in Puerto Rico and the return to Miami was delayed for a full 24-hours.
This meant we had to get our flights to NY changed. We would have to wait all day for a flight out of Ft. Lauderdale or Miami so we decided on an earlier flight out of West Palm Beach, some 45 miles away.
We got off the ship at the crack of dawn--literally, not like when I say that when I wake up at 8am--it was dark out. We miraculously hopped a ready-to-depart bus to W. Palm and we were off.
When we got to the airport, we saw that there was an earlier flight on the departures board. I asked about switching from our 1pm flight to this 9am one but was told, essentially, to beat it.
With a 5 hour wait ahead of us, we headed for security. There, my brother's cologne and my mother's hair detangler (she has really long hair, likely the longest you've ever seen) were victims of the 'no-liquids over a certain amount' rule implemented after the planned London attacks.
We arrived in NY only 10 minutes behind schedule. We were finally home.
Ah, that early hope of being home in no time. I remember it well. We waited for our 4 bags at the baggage carousel but they never came. It's not that unusual, I suppose, for 1 bag to be lost. But 4?! I waited on a long line at the Baggage office to report the missing bags.
When I reached the front, the woman told me that our bags were being held in another terminal, a short car ride away. O-k.
We got to the other terminal, headed for their Baggage Department and discovered all 4 bags lined up in a room. We just had to show our ids and they were ours to take home.
Of course, I couldn't leave well enough alone.
"So, why were our bags delivered to this terminal?"
"Um, they were on an earlier flight"
"Wait, isn't that completely against the rules? I always understood that the passenger MUST be on the same flight as their baggage...what with the terrorism concerns and all."
"Well, it's ok for us to decide to put your bag on without you, if we feel the bag is secure."
At this point my tired, cranky brother had had enough of my chit-chat and pulled me away.
But how ridiculous? The most basic safety precautions are being ignored while we remove our shoes and throw away our hair detangler. I am willing to do whatever necessary to ensure the safety of our airplanes, but we need to have a sane approach to safety, something we currently just don't have.
I don't have the answers beyond this: a bag which accompanies the passenger on their flight is that much less likely to blow up. Look into it.
Posted by Karol at January 5, 2007 02:35 AM | TrackBackTechnorati Tags: TSA Transportation+Security+Administration
"I am willing to do whatever necessary to ensure the safety of our airplanes"
I hope that's an overstatement.
Cavity searches for everyone!
Posted by: Joe Grossberg at January 5, 2007 08:28 AMWhy do you shill? I am going to give your tell away for free on my blog this week. Thus, everyone go visit my blog and bonus code Rooster at doyle's room. Thank you...
Posted by: joaquinochoa at January 5, 2007 08:39 AMBruce Schneier has a lot to say about airport security.
Posted by: David at January 5, 2007 09:11 AMThis poses some serious questions, but also some seriously weird ones:
First,would the suicide bomber whose explosive self-detonating bomb is in another plane be shamed if he didn't perish with the plan?
Also, if he (or she, if likely) landed without blowing up, looked at the tv to see that he indeed blew up the wrong plane, would his mission be successful? It is hard to say.
Now, think of the airline responsibility. If we were to assume that the airline wasn't liable in any other way for the plane blowing up for negligently screening the suitcase with a bomb, would the airline become liable if it became known that the wrong plane blew up?
While I do share your safety concerns. K, I would have been much more pissed off that my luggage got home 5-hours before I did after they told me I had to wait. Hmmph. F'n airline!
Posted by: Toby at January 5, 2007 11:17 AMBut how ridiculous? The most basic safety precautions are being ignored while we remove our shoes and throw away our hair detangler. I am willing to do whatever necessary to ensure the safety of our airplanes, but we need to have a sane approach to safety, something we currently just don't have.
What we currently have is an insane approach to making people who don't ever think about the larger implications of our policies feel safe. All the crap you go through at an airport has much less to do with actually keeping you safe than it does with giving the illusion of security.
Think about that giant cattle chute at McCarran airport in Las Vegas, the one between the security contractor who checks your ID and boarding pass and the point where you actually go through your security screening. There, you and hundreds of other people are squeezed single-file into a tiny area, shuffling forward to the TSA checkpoint. One of the thoughts that goes through my head every time I'm stuck there waiting to take my shoes off and remove my laptop from its case is this: how long before a determined suicide bomber bum-rushes the cattle line - which is completely unprotected - and kills fifty to a hundred people? What good will all the security precautions in the world have done the people (possibly including myself) who die on that day? I know what the response to such a situation would be: move the security checkpoint further back. Institute more random searches. Wait until someone summons up the will to kill more people at the new, earlier security checkpoint. Rinse. Repeat.
I travel by air much more than I'd really like to because of my work; if not for the Byzantine maze of restrictions designed to make everybody feel safe I'd actually feel a lot better about having to travel so much. If it were possible for me to go where I need to go quickly and efficiently by some other means than air travel, I'd switch in a heartbeat. Unfortunately, our scientists have yet to invent the teleporter. Bastards.
Posted by: Jason at January 5, 2007 04:41 PMOf course, one could encourage able-bodied righties to join up with the military, here; I hear the guys in Iraq are enduring some discomfort a bit more serious than is to be found in stateside airports.
Posted by: Bouldin at January 5, 2007 07:41 PMOf course, one could encourage able-bodied righties to join up with the military, here; I hear the guys in Iraq are enduring some discomfort a bit more serious than is to be found in stateside airports.
What the hell kind of flippant crap is this?
Posted by: Jason at January 6, 2007 12:20 AMWelcome back.
I want the baggage matched up with passengers on the plane if for no other reason in that it reduces the likelihood of lost baggage.
Hopefuly that person who had the heart attack survived and they dont decide to blame McDonalds
Posted by: spurwing plover at January 6, 2007 11:25 PM


