April 16, 2007
Perfect timing
In the "How do these people not walk into walls?" category:
The UK’s National Union of Journalists has voted to boycott Israeli goods in a controversial vote at the organisation’s Annual Delegate’s Meeting in Birmingham.The motion was passed by 66 votes to 54 and, according to the Guardian newspaper, was greeted with "a small amount of applause" on Friday.
Paragraph four of the motion read: "This ADM calls for a boycott of Israeli goods similar to those boycotts in the struggles against apartheid South Africa led by trade unions and the TUC to demand sanctions be imposed on Israel by the British government."
It was part of a motion proposed by James Gosling which called for the union to "condemn the savage, pre-planned attack on Lebanon" last summer and the "slaughter of civilians in Gaza" over the last few years.
Meanwhile, a Gaza Militant Group, says it has murdered one of their colleagues:
A previously unknown group in Gaza sent a statement to news organizations on Sunday claiming that it had killed Alan Johnston, the BBC correspondent who was kidnapped in Gaza City on March 12. The BBC said it was aware of the reports and deeply concerned, but emphasized that there was no independent verification of the claim, which it was treating as rumor.
No matter. Fighting for the wrong side comes a little too naturally to European elites. It's sad but not unexpected.
Posted by Karol at April 16, 2007 02:39 PM | TrackBackTechnorati Tags: National+Union+of+Journalists Israel+boycott
Hey Karol, have you read "The Wicked Son," by David Mamet yet?
Posted by: Gerard at April 16, 2007 07:46 PMJames Gosling and his cohorts are morally confused.
Hey Karol, have you read "The Wicked Son," by David Mamet yet?
No. Should I?
Posted by: Karol at April 17, 2007 03:26 AMWell, I thought it was kind of interesting.
It's basically an exegesis on apostasy-his term-within the (Western) Diaspora.
It's part of a series of non-fiction books published jointly by Shocken and Nextbook called "Jewish Encounters."
He goes off on a few psychological and artistic tangents and digressions that are a bit self-indulgent-IMO-but otherwise it's a pretty fascinating work.


