March 10, 2008
Everything changes on Day 1
First off, Pataki didn't have nearly enough hookers:
NY Governor Spitzer Is Linked to Prostitution Ring
"Embattled" no longer seems like the right term for this total disaster of a governorship.
Hat-tip Dorian Davis.
Posted by Karol at March 10, 2008 02:18 PM | TrackBackTechnorati Tags: Eliot+Spitzer
"Mr. Clean" must be his pimp name.
Posted by: Ed Z at March 10, 2008 02:27 PMI can't wait for the news conference. Nice thing to do for a former AG who spent most of his time bullying people over behavior that wasn't even criminal.
Can we have a do over on the election?
regards,
Posted by: Richard in NY at March 10, 2008 02:43 PMI just hope these high-end hookers weren't illegal aliens.
Otherwise, my smug sense of superiority over people who live in New Jersey will have been completely shattered.
Posted by: Gerard at March 10, 2008 02:46 PMNew York State will be the first State to have a Blind Governor!
I love when NY is the first in politics.
It's for an event like this that the Japanese have seppuku.
Posted by: James at March 10, 2008 02:50 PMPosted by: daniel at March 10, 2008 02:49 PM
I believe the proper terminology is "visually-impaired."
And black...
You can't get more groundbreaking than that.
Bite me, California!
Posted by: Gerard at March 10, 2008 03:03 PMI don't understand why he would PAY a New Yorker to get laid when he was already GETTING PAID a salary to screw New Yorkers.
Posted by: BadBoyInASuit at March 10, 2008 03:05 PMDammit. Why couldn't it be a BOY prostitute. Do Republicans have the monopoly on gay prostitution?
Drat. Why don't more married democrats screw rent boys?
Posted by: Toby at March 10, 2008 03:18 PMsecond pimp name Steamroller...
is he just trying to keep up with us over here in NJ?
Posted by: at March 10, 2008 03:47 PMAn article on Gawker says he was paying $5,500/hr. for the company.
$5,500?? An hour?? Were these ladies contortionists or something?
Posted by: Shawn at March 10, 2008 04:04 PM$5,500?? An hour?? Were these ladies contortionists or something?
I'm pretty sure that he thought he was paying a good $4,000-5,000 premium for confidentiality and discretion.
Uh, whoopsie.
Posted by: Sean at March 10, 2008 04:27 PMDrat. Why don't more married democrats screw rent boys?
Don't fret, there's always McGreevey.
Posted by: Karol at March 10, 2008 04:42 PMRest assured, there are children in some impoverished, third world nation walking around with McGreevy-Spitzer '12 buttons on their lapels right now.
Posted by: Gerard at March 11, 2008 12:47 AM
