June 04, 2008
If I hadn't already used the "oh snap" headline this week...
Ann Coulter on Hillary winning the popular vote but Obama winning according to the party rules (via Hot Air Headlines):
It's the exact same situation as in 2000, with Hillary in the position of Gore and Obama in the position of Bush. The only difference is: Hillary has a much stronger argument than Gore ever did (and Hillary's more of a man than Gore ever was).
A must-read. Really. For gems like this when Ann explains the electoral college:
When you vote for president this fall, you will not be voting for Barack Obama or John McCain; you will be voting for an elector who pledges to cast his vote for Obama or McCain. (For those new Obama voters who may be reading, it's like voting for Paula, Randy or Simon to represent you, instead of texting your vote directly.)Posted by Karol at June 4, 2008 09:56 PM | TrackBack
Technorati Tags: Election+2008 Ann+Coulter
Comments
Ann Coulter needs to check her sources before issuing statements like this one. She's using Hillary's own math and she doesn't do any fact-checking on it?
Hillary didn't include ANY of the caucus data in her calculations! Why not? Oh, right. Because Obama won all but ONE of those contests.
This is a non-story. It doesn't exist.
Posted by: Pokerwolf at June 5, 2008 09:16 AMA fallacy built on a straw man and bundled with some delusions ... but with very good punchlines.
Posted by: Charles at June 5, 2008 02:29 PMPost a comment
