ALARMINGNEWS_1_1.jpg

August 19, 2008

#2

As everyone knows, I love me some Rudy Giuliani. But as McCain's VP? I don't think so. McCain has to pick someone more conservative than he is, not less, and though Rudy would bring a rockstar quality to the ticket (the fact that he barely participated in the primary process insured his star power remained intact), he would not put NY in play (c'mon, now) and he would further piss off the already pretty pissed off social conservatives.

I agree with Allah, I think it's Tim Pawlenty. He makes a lot of sense. He puts Minnesota in play, he's conservative enough and he has no obvious marks against him. Plus, the convention is in his home state. That's a bonus.

Posted by Karol at August 19, 2008 11:44 AM | TrackBack
Technorati Tags:
Comments

Wow, Giulani as veep would be _precisely_ what my mother was talking about when she said, "McCain will find a way to screw it up before November...".

Because, unlike Democrats who say "This is it, I'm staying home", conservative GOPers _will_ stay home to send a message.

Posted by: James at August 19, 2008 12:18 PM

I was going to say Huckabee, not that I'm obsessed or anything, but huck would be a mistake...he's too good...he'd make mccain look bad...

but I don't think he can take someone boring like pawlenty.....I'm thinking he should select Ridge...hopefully win Pennsylvania and not lose much for being pro choice...he can go head to head with someone like Biden

Posted by: Larry at August 19, 2008 01:24 PM

Ridge has the same problems as Rudy but without any star power. And you consider Ridge less boring that Pawlenty? No way.

Posted by: Karol at August 19, 2008 01:28 PM

Karol, five minutes after Obama announces Bidean as his veep, McCain should absolutely nominate a female as his veep, forever shattering the pro-Hillary block.

Posted by: Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg at August 19, 2008 01:59 PM

I dont' know. Rudy at Veep wouldnt' go over well for conservatives like George Marlin. He's rip the ticket to shreds.

Posted by: danielnyc at August 19, 2008 02:25 PM

Um, Tom "Color Code" Ridge? Surely you jest. Anyone who has been near the train wreck known as Homeland Security should not even make it past the first stage of vetting.

As to Huck--while yes, you are obsessed Larry, in this case I agree that Huck's dynamic personality would not fit well in the McCain campaign.

Is there a reason Alaska's governor doesn't work? Because I'm with Snoop--that'd be the stake to the heart to go with the knife in the gut for Hillary supporters.

However, I still say until the balloons drop I'm not buying she's done.

Posted by: James at August 19, 2008 02:36 PM

Because I'm with Snoop--that'd be the stake to the heart to go with the knife in the gut for Hillary supporters.

Here's the thing: How can McCain use the inexperienced argument on Obama when Palin who has similar experience to him would be a (fairly aged) heartbeat away from the presidency? I like her a lot, it just isn't her time.

Posted by: Karol at August 19, 2008 02:44 PM

"How can McCain use the inexperienced argument..."

I don't think he really has to. People will see that for themselves. Anyway, I was thinking more along the lines of Kay Bailey Hutchinson.

Posted by: Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg at August 19, 2008 03:02 PM

The only bad thing about Pawlenty is that he is a global warming nut.

Posted by: Jake at August 19, 2008 03:04 PM

I don't know, I think the inexperienced argument is still in play. After all, Obama's executive experience is what, exactly? In contrast, Palin has been governor for two years of a state that is a major energy producer and, before that, a successful mayor. Even better, if Obama or his surrogates attempt your argument then it brings experience into full play. That's a winner everytime for McCain.

Second, I think that too much experience is _not_ a good thing for this election cycle. The only reason Obama is still in serious discussion and not still licking wounds from a poor primary is that people are genuinely sick of Washington. In contrast, McCain picks a woman, non-Washington insider, and fairly strong pol in her own right...well, yeah, I'm thinking that maybe there might be a little bit of a splash from that.

Yes, the fact that she will have higher than average odds of becoming the first female president would be a caution. However, let's also recall that she will be ideally placed to spring off even a mediocre McCain administration and attempt a run herself.

However, I'm not opposed to Hutchinson either. ;)

Posted by: James at August 19, 2008 03:10 PM

James,

What makes you think I'm obsessed with Huck (HUCK YEA, WOOHOO)?

I understand the arguments against Ridge...I'm thinking maybe he can bring Pennsylvania...and he does have some serious credentials.....someone like pawlenty is too boring....I don't think Sarah Pallin is experienced enough.

Posted by: Larry at August 19, 2008 03:16 PM

I'd go against Sarah Palin as McCain's VP for the same reason I'd go against Jindal: both probably could do more good in their home states.

As for KBH, she's still toying with the idea of running for Governor.

Posted by: Shawn at August 19, 2008 03:30 PM

I still like Romney.

Posted by: Christopher Calandro at August 19, 2008 03:32 PM

Rudy won't put NY in Play but he will certainly soldify Florida and put New Jersey in Play

Posted by: Dennis D at August 19, 2008 06:00 PM

Florida would be reason enough. But is it true?

Posted by: Eric at August 20, 2008 12:32 AM

I think McCain should get Christ as his running mate. Just think of it, "McCain/Christ." Or, "I have Christ as my co-pilot." Or, "who can loose with Christ by your side?"

Now that he has a "girlfriend," albeit a married one, the speculation is all but truly false.

Posted by: Toby at August 20, 2008 12:22 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?