October 15, 2008
Resigned to a president Obama
McCain, advisers split over attacking Obama-Wright ties
Here's the thing (what's the thing?, tell me the thing): October 15th is waaaaaaay too late to have advisers split on anything. Bring up Wright, don't bring up Wright, it likely won't matter. Voters already know that Obama loves hanging out with shady people. They don't care because they've just watched their 401k accounts take a massive hit and Obama is pretending that his being president will somehow change that. It won't. But it sure sounds nice. Can McCain say something, anything, that sounds nice? Obama's policies, the few that he has explained, are patently idiotic. Perhaps McCain can point that out instead of talking about a guy who was in the news months ago. Explain to people that their wallets will take a hit under Obama. They'll have to, there's no other way for him to pay for his lalaland plans.
What does matter is that it's October 15th and McCain has nothing I'd consider to be a cohesive message. Don't get me wrong, Obama's message of "I'm not Bush" isn't exactly a mind-blower but at least he's got something.
It's hard to care about a McCain win when he doesn't seem to.
Posted by Karol at October 15, 2008 01:59 PM | TrackBackTechnorati Tags: Barack+Obama John+McCain
patently idiotic
Which ones? And what is the McCain alternative that you find to be less than "patently idiotic?"
Posted by: katie g. at October 15, 2008 02:27 PM
The one about everyone getting healthcare to start. Sounds nice, actually translates to bankruptcy.
I'm no McCain fan but that's because he's not conservative enough. He is a notch to the right of Obama, that's why he'll get my vote, but he's several notches to the left of where I'd like, that's why I'm not flying across the country to help him out (like I did for Bush).
Posted by: Karol at October 15, 2008 03:13 PMYou've hit the nail smartly on the head Karol. IMO McCain will inevitably suffer because his is the party which has been in power for the last 7 or so years.
Posted by: bryan at October 15, 2008 03:37 PMPS have you heard of a rapper called MIA?
Posted by: bryan at October 15, 2008 03:38 PMYes, MIA is huge here.
Posted by: Karol at October 15, 2008 04:01 PMHe is a notch to the right of Obama, that's why he'll get my vote, but he's several notches to the left of where I'd like, that's why I'm not flying across the country to help him out (like I did for Bush).
Uhhh, you do realize that McCain is to the right of Bush?
Posted by: Not Dawn Summers at October 15, 2008 04:02 PMNope, not on any of the issues that matter to me.
Posted by: Karol at October 15, 2008 04:11 PMHe's to the right of the Bush that's leaving office in January, but still far to the left of the Bush I campaigned for twice...
Posted by: Jay at October 15, 2008 04:18 PMThat's true too.
Posted by: Karol at October 15, 2008 04:37 PMObama's plan - so you can actually read it: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/issues/HealthCareFullPlan.pdf
And I'm not sure how the health care spending suggested here will bankrupt us any faster than when we buy up all of the distressed mortgages, CDOs, preferred stock in the Wall St. banks...oh yeah, and fight two wars that are costing billions a day... But hey, those are problems both candidates are going to inherit, I guess...
I guess the difference is -- spending money on health care for Americans - to me, anyway - seems like the compassionate and right thing to do.
Posted by: katie g. at October 15, 2008 06:28 PMhow can anyone deny that obama believes in socialistic policies?....Obama used the term "spreading the wealth" a few days ago and biden said it was patriotic to pay more taxes...help out the little guy.
by the way...I'm making a pledge not to mention Mike Huckabee again....until Nov. 5th...when 2012 begins.
Posted by: Larry at October 15, 2008 07:28 PMKarol,
I know you don't like when people bring up the fact that the Republicans have abdicated libertarian economic principals -- and yes, it's old and tired, and wholly unoriginal.
But I think it goes a way towards explaining why McCain (and local Republicans) are having such a tough time. It used to be that you knew what Republicans were about: Lower taxes, lower spending, social conservatism and a strong national defense. The Democrats have never had core values as a party, and so were naturally the reactive party.
But the Republicans have ceded this advantage after 8 years of George Bush, and then nominating the least Republican Republican in the race. Personally, I think it's over.
Posted by: Joe Weisenthal at October 15, 2008 08:38 PMJoe, I actually completely agree with you that Republicans in power have messed up the Republican brand. Not just one economics, on everything! And I agree that McCain was the worst candidate of the bunch.
Posted by: Karol at October 15, 2008 09:41 PMKarol, I feel slightly better knowing that you thought McCain was the worst candidate :)
Posted by: Larry at October 15, 2008 11:35 PM"Joe, I actually completely agree with you that Republicans in power have messed up the Republican brand"
Republican BRAND???
That just about says it all.
At least you can have years in opposition luxuriating in the political boutiques looking for the brand that suits you best. Getting your kicks from some silver tongued snake oil salesman saying what you want to hear. Give him (or her) your time and support. Watch with amazment when the closer to power they get how the "lies water down and the promises rust". Principles evaporate. Sometimes for hard, well thought out pragmatic reasons, but mainly for electoral gain and career furtherence.
Stay away from power and the brand will remain untarnished for you.
It is the same how years in power messed up the Communist brand.
Really, what do you expect from your leaders?
Events have dictated Bush's actions in the same way that they do for every other leader.
Do you think honestly Thatcher and Reagan were much more right wing than GW Bush?
For someone who struck me as being wordly wise and switched on, don't tell me you still have faith in politicians? Surely?
Posted by: Urbane McMeercat at October 16, 2008 06:14 AMUrbane, principles are what make up the brand. If people don't know what you stand for, they won't vote for you. If Republican used to mean a set of things and no longer does, people won't vote for you. Reagan was easily more rightwing than Bush. And no, of course I have no faith in politicians, I believe there are, at most, marginal differences between them. The best part about the probable Obama win is just how not different he's going to be from every other leader we've had.
Posted by: Karol at October 16, 2008 08:56 AM"...how not different he's going to be from every other leader we've had."
I'm not sure what you mean by "not different," but Obama will be one of the worst we've ever had.
Liberals propagate this myth that Bush "stifles dissent." Wait till Obama is elected: any criticism will be decried as racism. The Secret Service has visited someone just because an Obama-loving pollster twisted the lady's words. How will it be when he's actually elected?
Conservatives blast Bush for his massive spending increases that would make LBJ and FDR envious. Obama will make Bush look frugal.
Liberals blast Bush for pre-emptive strikes, starting unwinnable wars, etc. Obama said he'll simply bomb a Pakistan if we think Osama is hiding there -- leading to the downfall of the Pakistani government as militants take it over and get their hands on nukes. Great!
Conservatives blast Bush for the inefficacy of tax "rebates" versus actual tax cuts. Obama will convolute the tax system so that everyone will be taxed to hell and back.
He's not just different. He's a whole lot worse.
Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at October 16, 2008 09:55 AMI totally agree, Perry. His supporters think he's going to sweep into office and we'll all be holding hands while singing kumbaya and enjoying our nationalized health care.
Posted by: Karol at October 16, 2008 10:03 AMObama hanging out with shady people? How about Obama and ACORN? ACORN is more than just "shady." It would appear to me that ACORN should be investigated for violation of federal and civil RICO statutes (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act). Obama's relationship with ACORN shows a long-standing pattern of behavior and close association with ACORN---an organization attempting to, and/or conspiring to commit fraud. This may include mail fraud and wire fraud. Investigate ACORN and Obama under RICO.
Posted by: Deanna at October 17, 2008 12:08 AM


