ALARMINGNEWS_1_1.jpg

March 24, 2009

Apparently you ain't parents

U.S. couple demands Israel take responsibility for severely wounding son

Let's review, for all the useful idiots who go to Israel to protect terrorists: YOU ARE ENTERING A WAR ZONE. You're taking the side of a people who use children as shields; if you think they won't use you you're dumber than you look.

Further helpful information: don't throw rocks at armed soldiers who have to live in the warzone that you're visiting before going back to your cush California life. They might be slightly on edge.

Posted by Karol at March 24, 2009 11:43 AM | TrackBack
Technorati Tags:
Comments

Their son was severly wounded when he arrived in Israel. Having no brain or mental acuity is pretty serious. And I have to wonder, why does Israel continue to let these pieces of liberal shit in?

Posted by: elana at March 24, 2009 11:57 AM

An IDF spokesperson has said there was heavy stone-throwing and troops fired tear gas during the demonstration, though protesters said the stone-throwing was sporadic Well, I suppose that changes everything then, doesn't it?

Posted by: Gerard at March 24, 2009 12:40 PM

I'll just wait until Bryan assures us that the stone-throwing was sporadic. Then we'll know that's wrong.

Posted by: Confirmable at March 24, 2009 02:20 PM

Every once in while we agree. First, this guy was a 38 year old adult. Second, he was going to protest against Israel. Third, as you pointed out - you're entering a war zone.

its akin to contributory negligence: when you knowingly put yourself in that situation, you've got to know the potential result... A shame he died. But the litigation from the parents - frivolous.

Posted by: katie g at March 24, 2009 02:37 PM

Rachels

Posted by: Gerard at March 24, 2009 03:04 PM

This reminds me of Nick Berg. You know, the guy who went to Iraq and got beheaded in a Jihadi snuff film. Then his dad blamed George Bush.

Posted by: Eric at March 24, 2009 06:18 PM

GGGGOOOOAAAALLLL.

Wait, that was f-ed up, wasn't it?

Posted by: James at March 24, 2009 09:14 PM

Well it's not like they threw him in front of a bulldozer or anything!

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at March 25, 2009 12:23 AM

I'd love that anonymous coward to show a post where I have defended stuff the palestinians do.

Posted by: bryan at March 25, 2009 02:48 AM

I will say in Bryan's defense he does castigate the Palestinians about as often as the Israelis.

Posted by: James at March 25, 2009 08:02 AM

How in the bonnie blue blazes did this guy even get a passport or allowed entrance into another country? You think stunts like this would have popped up on somebody's radar screen:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/22/BAA211CR3K.DTL&hw=Tristan+Anderson&sn=001&sc=1000

Posted by: Von Bek at March 25, 2009 09:29 AM

Are you saying that whatever the IDF did was OK because it was a "war zone" and this guy was protesting against Israeli policy?

"Anderson did not throw any stones and was struck after he had returned to the village, witnesses said."

The allegation is use of undue force. Maybe it's right, maybe it's wrong, but I don't understand how you can dismiss it out of hand.

Posted by: Josh at March 30, 2009 09:26 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?